You can download the sample Linguistics case study on Cognitive Approaches to Discourse Analysis with the following question for free at the end of this page. For further assistance with Linguistics Assignment help, please check our offerings in Linguistics assignment solutions. Our subject-matter experts provide online assignment help to Linguistics students from across the world and deliver plagiarism free solution with a free Turnitin report with every solution.
(AssignmentEssayHelp does not recommend anyone to use this sample as their own work.)
What are the Chinese Characters used in Japanese and Korean Language?
Chinese characters in Japanese and Korean languages
This essay compares the extent to which the Korean and Japanese languages use Chinese characters. We will begin with a discussion of how the characters entered the Japanese and Korean language spaces, as it has an important bearing on the development of their indigenous languages. We shall then focus on the extent of influence of the Chinese characters along with details of how many of them were used and in what manner they were assimilated into the languages under discussion. This also entails a brief description of the attitudes of the indigenous population towards the use of Chinese characters based on the socio-political dynamics over various periods in history. We shall also examine the status of the languages today, and the importance given to the absorption and use of the characters. The main source of information used in this essay is derived from the contents of the book, “Asia’s Orthographic Dilemma” written by Hannas.Wm.C and published in 1997.
Both Japanese and Korean languages are believed to be ‘Altaic’ and have no connection to Chinese linguistically. Japanese today use the mixed script which is a combination of Chinese characters with their phonetic and semantic conventions and the indigenous language. Two types of texts, the kambun, written in Chinese style, and kana written in colloquial Japanese have merged to make up the Japanese writing system that exists today. According to historical evidence, (Hannas, 1997), Chinese script was introduced when books were brought to Japan around late 3rd and 5th centuries A.D.* Development of the Japanese script was prompted by the urge to read the Chinese text in Japanese and to document the elements of the indigenous language. This resulted in giving Japanese interpretations to Chinese characters to be able to make the Chinese texts intelligible to the people.
Similarly, religious and other texts were brought to Korea and the necessity to read them resulted in the introduction of Chinese characters in Korea. The other hand the Koreans use the ‘hangul’ which is a mixed script like the Japanese but developed on a phonetic basis and is totally indigenous. Whereas the Japanese adopted, modified and assimilated the Chinese characters to their indigenous language and complicating it in the process, the Koreans used the syllable structure of the Chinese and developed their own phonetic script. While the Japanese use a mixed character-phonetic script, the Koreans rarely use characters to express indigenous words. There is a marked difference in the inclination of Koreans and Japanese towards the use of Chinese characters. While the former attempted to change the semantic and phonetic attributes to suit their language, the latter wished to do away entirely with Chinese characters by inventing a new script.
The Chinese characters were structurally complete units and were grafted on to the Japanese language and being ill-suited to the nature of the Japanese, a number of modifications had to be made to accommodate them usefully. This led to a lot of complexity in the development of the Japanese language. Neither Japanese nor Korean language had any genetic connection to the Chinese and any linguistic commonality is attributable to borrowings of Chinese characters into these languages.
The use of Chinese characters was associated with erudition and prestige and hence they continued to be used giving rise to a mixed script. (Kaplan, et al August 2008).
Both Japanese and Korean languages are agglutinative languages as opposed to Chinese which is an isolating language.* The basic structure of a transitive Japanese sentence is SOV while that of Chinese is SVO (Hannes, 1997)
With Japanese, the major difficulty is that character sets are hardly related to its language sounds and therefore it needs a number of methods to make them represent the language. This has been a major difficulty for Japanese in adapting to the Chinese characters.
Chinese characters were used
- To represent borrowed Sinitic terms.
- To represent native Japanese words that may mean the same as the Chinese ones.
Nearly half of the Japanese lexicon today is made up of Sinitic terms and this was made possible due to the ‘kambun’ system of making Chinese texts interpretable in indigenous Japanese.
It is observed that, around 3000 kanji or Chinese characters are currently being used in the Japanese newspapers and magazines. It is necessary for children to be taught these characters as it widely used in society. Over the past 100 years the government decrees and other measures have been trying to restrict the use of kanji in the common language and for teaching children in schools. This could be the result of westernisation of Japan. Kanji is also used for scientific and technological purposes and personal names. According to their frequency of use, JIS (Japanese Industrial Standard) lists 3 levels of kanji. (Taylor, 1995). The Japanese and Koreans use Chinese characters in similar ways except that using but they differ in the readings they give to characters. While the Koreans use only Chinese reading of characters, Japanese use various readings in the Chinese and native languages resulting in multiple meanings that have to be determined from context. In contrast, the Koreans prefer to use Hangeul, which is their own script, and avoid the use of Chinese characters.
 There is no evidence as to whether Japanese language had a workable script prior to this period
 The Chinese language does not allow for changes in sounds if there are grammatical variations; Korean and Japanese languages have post positions or indicators and verbal and adjectival inflections to reflect grammatical variations……….
(Some parts of the solution has been blurred due to privacy protection policy)